< Return to Litigation & Valuation Report
Litigation & Valuation Report - September/October 2011 Edition
Thursday, September 01, 2011 - Tony Argiz, CPA*/ABV/CFF, ASA, CVA, CFE
Do you know whether it’s a good strategic decision for the defense to engage a damages expert in cases involving monetary damages? Or whether preparing a full-blown valuation for a client is always necessary?
MBAF is pleased to present the September/October 2011 issue of the Litigation & Valuation Report. In it, we discuss:
- Two court cases that illustrate the potential risks and rewards of challenging the plaintiff’s damages expert without presenting an alternative damages estimate,
- Situations when an appraiser might suggest using a calculation of value instead of a full valuation,
- How to value a startup company that lacks a solid track record, and
- The results of a worldwide fraud survey.
To view a PDF of this newsletter with full articles, please visit our website by clicking
Litigation & Valuation Report - September/October 2011 Edition
The ideas we discuss in the Litigation & Valuation Report are relevant to your success, and we welcome your questions or comments. We realize that we cannot fully address these complex issues in a few short articles, so we invite you to call us at 1-800-239-1474 to discuss your needs. MBAF would be glad to assist you in any way we can.
Sincerely,
- Tony Argiz
- CPA*/ABV/CFF, ASA, CVA,
- CFE, Chairman and CEO
- targiz@mbafcpa.com
- (305) 373-5500
